205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.34%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 12.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.20%
Similar cost growth to AMD's 4.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.44%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AMD's 25.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Margin decline while AMD shows 11.41% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.99%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.86%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.73%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 2.25%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.49%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 48.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 32.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of AMD's 151.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AMD's 123.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.92%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.03%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.46%
Tax expense change of 57.46% while AMD maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-7.68%
Net income decline while AMD shows 190.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.78%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 158.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.29%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.04%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.