205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 3.09%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 1.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.57%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.02%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 4.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 1.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 5.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 1.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 3789.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.31%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 132.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 125.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 238.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Net income decline while AMD shows 97.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.86%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 91.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.68%
EPS decline while AMD shows 95.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.22%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 114.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.47%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.