205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.35%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 24.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.65%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 8.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.35%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 78.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.03%
Margin expansion below 50% of AMD's 43.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.70%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 3.99%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.86%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 6.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.51%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AMD's 574.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AMD's 443.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.39%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 92.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.18%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 93.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 109.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.18%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 91.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 93.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.40%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 91.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.85%
Net income growth below 50% of AMD's 91.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.59%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 93.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.57%
EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.57%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.