205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 31.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.86%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 33.38%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.06%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 30.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.88%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 11.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
D&A growth less than half of AMD's 18.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 244.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 209.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 191.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 169.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 20.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.06%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 103.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 102.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.34%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Net income decline while AMD shows 88.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 91.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.44%
EPS decline while AMD shows 88.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.27%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 88.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.21%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.