205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.08%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 5.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.67%
Cost growth 50-75% of AMD's 9.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
12.14%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.80%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.95%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 14.86%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
Other expenses change of 70.00% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.50%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of AMD's 10.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.94%
Total costs growth 50-75% of AMD's 10.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.79%
D&A change of 1.79% while AMD maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
13.01%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.60%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.53%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.83%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-42.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.09%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.43%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.38%
Tax expense change of 14.38% while AMD maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
16.87%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.87%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.03%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.