205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.46%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AMD's 4.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Margin decline while AMD shows 6.78% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.47%
R&D change of 0.47% while AMD maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses change of 550.00% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.41%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.78%
Total costs growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 22.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 25.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 94.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 99.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.98%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 220.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 227.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.79%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.94%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.