205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.23%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 7.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.00%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 9.37%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.51%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 5.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.84%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1030.77%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.67%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.49%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.88%
Total costs growth 50-75% of AMD's 5.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
150.00%
Interest expense growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.52%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 11.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.72%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 3.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.06%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 31.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 22.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-950.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.19%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 43.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 33.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.47%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-10.57%
Net income decline while AMD shows 59.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.77%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 48.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.77%
EPS decline while AMD shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.93%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 62.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.04%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.95%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.