205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 25.84%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 33.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Similar gross profit growth to AMD's 13.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
6.43%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.40%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses change of 152.04% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.10%
Similar total costs growth to AMD's 14.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.05%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 416.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.82%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 310.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.84%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 404.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 341.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.48%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 171.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 157.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Net income decline while AMD shows 164.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 151.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
EPS decline while AMD shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 8.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 1.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.