205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.60%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.27%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 0.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
3.58%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.95%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.33%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.37%
Total costs growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
Interest expense change of 9.09% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.66%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.03%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.43%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.75%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.21%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.17%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.10%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.41%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.45%
EPS change of 6.45% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
6.56%
Diluted EPS change of 6.56% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.94%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.