205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.10%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 12.63%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.00%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 15.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 3.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.07%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.25%
R&D reduction while AMD shows 2.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
Other expenses change of 2.47% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-4.36%
Operating expenses reduction while AMD shows 6.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.94%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 12.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.58%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.17%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.25%
Similar operating income growth to AMD's 19.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
8.63%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AMD's 28.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.81%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
16.08%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 2.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.45%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.66%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.07%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 3.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.92%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.40%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.52%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.