205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.28%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 27.26%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.84%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 28.25%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.83%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AMD's 25.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.38%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.52%
R&D growth 50-75% of AMD's 6.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.84%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 87.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-14.29%
Interest expense reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.28%
D&A change of 1.28% while AMD maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.85%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.74%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.89%
Operating income growth below 50% of AMD's 413.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AMD's 346.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.67%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.32%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.27%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.19%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.46%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.05%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.