205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.26%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AMD's 11.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.48%
Similar cost growth to AMD's 8.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
5.32%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AMD's 14.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.89%
Margin decline while AMD shows 2.77% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 22.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.62%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 39.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.28%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 21.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.77%
Interest expense reduction while AMD shows 92.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.15%
D&A growth less than half of AMD's 93.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
6.38%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of AMD's 12.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.11%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AMD's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.24%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.51%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 47.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.14%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.09%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.20%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 17.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 15.74% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.