205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AMD's 6.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2.87%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
5.54%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AMD's 10.93%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.09%
Margin expansion below 50% of AMD's 4.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.18%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x AMD's 3.80%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.04%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.38%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.93%
Interest expense change of 12.93% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.25%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.68%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 24.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.86%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 16.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.95%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 647.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.04%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 600.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.29%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.56%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 367.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 338.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.17%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 178.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.99%
Net income growth below 50% of AMD's 115.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.31%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 102.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.65%
EPS growth below 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AMD's 128.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.22%
Share count increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.