PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.31%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
11.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.84%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.93%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 12.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.10%
Similar total costs growth to AVGO's 6.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.91%
Interest expense growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.33%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
13.20%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.05%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.99%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-77.08%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.83%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.66%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.84%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.85%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.16%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.