205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.10%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.19%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.79%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Similar total costs growth to AVGO's 6.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
12.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.52%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.96%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.