205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.32%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.84%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.87%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.29%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.47%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.72%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.45%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-72.60%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.45%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 61.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-106.82%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.22%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.