205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.95%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.49%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
59.31%
Similar EBITDA growth to AVGO's 62.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
63.07%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to AVGO's 61.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
24.74%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.68%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-82.46%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.98%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
587.55%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.76%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.