205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.28%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
16.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.69%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.71%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.96%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of AVGO's 12.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.62%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x AVGO's 6.00%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.68%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
42.76%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of AVGO's 62.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
26.19%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.17%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.86%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.68%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.72%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.43%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.53%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.38%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.