205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.25%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 19.53%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 12.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 62.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 61.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.67%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.68%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-4.07%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.