205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.30%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.38%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-17.26%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.60%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.97%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.50%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
1060.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 62.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1103.17%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 61.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.09%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.27%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-53.10%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.62%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.56%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.73%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
17.08%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.