205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.40%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.26%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-29.55%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.13%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.70%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.76%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
247.08%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
88.10%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 62.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
125.00%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 61.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-62.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.59%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-63.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.10%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-63.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.79%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-12.19%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.