205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.42%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.20%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-49.76%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-37.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.62%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 12.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.57%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 6.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.42%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-76.74%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.13%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 61.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-261.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.85%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-180.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-199.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.56%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-185.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-206.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.23%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.