205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.23%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.50%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.32%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.11%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.49%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.32%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.62%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
53.06%
Similar EBITDA growth to AVGO's 62.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
68.62%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 61.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
17.79%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.43%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-47.62%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.89%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-79.66%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.61%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.57%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.67%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.