PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.35%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.65%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.35%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.03%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.70%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 12.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.86%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.51%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
7.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.40%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.85%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.57%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.27%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.