205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.98%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.19%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.45%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.72%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 12.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.58%
Similar total costs growth to AVGO's 6.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.24%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.84%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 61.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
213.16%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.91%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.94%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-263.64%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.89%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.32%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.05%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-10.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.