205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 6.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
31.38%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
75.90%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.77%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
51.98%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.