205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.06%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AVGO's 0.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.25%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.43%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 19.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 4313.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.90%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.69%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.94%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.24%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.23%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-16.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.24%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.29%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.33%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.