205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of AVGO's 0.59%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.09%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.03%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.12%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.24%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.25%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 6.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
13.71%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.44%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.38%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.38%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.44%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.38%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.30%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 1023.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.80%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.75%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.13%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.23%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.