205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.85%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 0.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.39%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.35%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 0.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.63%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.72%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.55%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.90%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 6.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.39%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.79%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 62.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 61.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.29%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 3.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-22.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.74%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.91%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.77%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.