205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Revenue growth below 50% of AVGO's 81.03%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.26%
Cost growth less than half of AVGO's 154.65%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.67%
Similar gross profit growth to AVGO's 10.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
2.18%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.87%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 110.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.34%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 147.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 152.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.17%
Interest expense reduction while AVGO shows 5400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.33%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 321.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.02%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.15%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.65%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.51%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.76%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.19%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.35%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.94%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.72%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.