205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.64%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 2.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.91%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.17%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 4.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
Margin decline while AVGO shows 1.94% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.68%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.27%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.92%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.06%
Total costs growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 11.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 4.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.91%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 33.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.62%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.52%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 33.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 29.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.40%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.48%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.48%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 152.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.48%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 164.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.74%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.19%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.