205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.23%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.85%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 3.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
10.73%
Positive growth while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.00%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.44%
Similar R&D growth to AVGO's 2.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.22%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 1.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.93%
Similar total costs growth to AVGO's 2.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.11%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.17%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 7.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.17%
EBITDA change of 15.17% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
6.09%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.21%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.90%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 62.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
18.41%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of AVGO's 36.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 35.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
66.67%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.92%
Net income growth below 50% of AVGO's 84.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.43%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 81.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of AVGO's 83.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AVGO's 92.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.40%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 1.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.