205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 8.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 6.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 10.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of AVGO's 2.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.93%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 33.33%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 3.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.25%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-0.44%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 0.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 15.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 4.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.58%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 33.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.05%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 22.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 37.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 26.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
139.29%
Similar tax expense growth to AVGO's 128.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-73.23%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 32.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 21.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.