205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.77%
Revenue decline while INTC shows 12.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.54%
Cost growth less than half of INTC's 22.49%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.59%
Gross profit decline while INTC shows 6.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.65%
R&D growth 50-75% of INTC's 14.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.41%
Other expenses change of 101.41% while INTC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
28.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.24%
Total costs growth less than half of INTC's 16.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.18%
Operating income decline while INTC shows 3.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while INTC shows 52.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while INTC shows 5.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Tax expense reduction while INTC shows 23.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
EPS decline while INTC shows 1.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.57%
Diluted EPS decline while INTC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.43%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.42%
Diluted share increase while INTC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.