205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.12%
Revenue decline while INTC shows 0.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.03%
Cost reduction while INTC shows 14.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.95%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.21%
R&D reduction while INTC shows 0.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2925.00%
Other expenses change of 2925.00% while INTC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
45.22%
Operating expenses growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.34%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while INTC shows 71.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.06%
D&A reduction while INTC shows 1.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-58.44%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
433.33%
Other expenses growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-81.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-66.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.49%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.