205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while INTC shows 5.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while INTC shows 3.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Gross profit decline while INTC shows 7.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
Margin expansion 50-75% of INTC's 1.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
2.93%
R&D growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.58%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of INTC's 4.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while INTC shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while INTC shows 6.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Operating income decline while INTC shows 5.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
Pre-tax income decline while INTC shows 1.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of INTC's 375.39%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-73.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.