205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.82%
Revenue growth 50-75% of LSCC's 33.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-19.07%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
177.57%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
129.74%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
166.86%
Operating expenses change of 166.86% while LSCC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
14.73%
Total costs change of 14.73% while LSCC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
332.53%
D&A change of 332.53% while LSCC maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2457.63%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2051.37%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.26%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
190.73%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-385.50%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 101.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-65.91%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-164.75%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.77%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.29%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 34.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 34.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.85%
Share count change of 19.85% while LSCC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
19.85%
Diluted share change of 19.85% while LSCC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.