205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.37%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 27.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
25.34%
Similar cost growth to LSCC's 30.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-66.29%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 24.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-59.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-59.57%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.57%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 26.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.36%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-123.01%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 20.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-127.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.44%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 31.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.74%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 3.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
120.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of LSCC's 400.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-21.93%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 17.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
188.89%
Similar tax expense growth to LSCC's 200.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-63.79%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.18%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 11.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.00%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 602.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.00%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 602.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.12%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.12%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.