205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.70%
Positive growth while LSCC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-33.41%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
171.79%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
159.59%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.90%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.89%
Total costs growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
450.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x LSCC's 28.57%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-560.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-530.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1233.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1173.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-366.67%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-800.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-759.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-700.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-664.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-445.24%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-445.24%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.