205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Positive growth while LSCC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.34%
Cost increase while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.99%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-8.08%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 1.63% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-351.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
D&A reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-32004.55%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
38.00%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.38%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
16.37%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LSCC's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.