205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.76%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.53%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 3.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.84%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 2.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.58%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-20.82%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.42%
D&A reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-61.38%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 3.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.83%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 3.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.12%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 0.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
109.52%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 33.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-44.19%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 6.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 3.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.60%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 1.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-43.99%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 9.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.55%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 5.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.89%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.89%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 2.49% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.