205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.30%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.38%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 0.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion below 50% of LSCC's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.60%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.97%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 0.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.50%
D&A growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.21%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1060.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 288.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1103.17%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 296.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.09%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.27%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-53.10%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 125.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.57%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 4.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 4.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.62%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 4.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.77%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 4.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.58%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 4.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.56%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.63%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.73%
Share count increase while LSCC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.08%
Diluted share increase while LSCC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.