205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Positive growth while LSCC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.86%
Cost growth 50-75% of LSCC's 6.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
15.92%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while LSCC shows 5.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 5.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of LSCC's 5.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Similar D&A growth to LSCC's 3.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
31.38%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of LSCC's 55.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.90%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 137.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.77%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Net margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.74%
Share count change of 50.74% while LSCC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
51.98%
Diluted share change of 51.98% while LSCC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.