205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.99%
Revenue growth below 50% of LSCC's 40.19%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.41%
Cost growth less than half of LSCC's 11.82%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
10.72%
Gross profit growth below 50% of LSCC's 71.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.46%
Margin expansion below 50% of LSCC's 22.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.27%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.17%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.57%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.61%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.45%
EBITDA growth below 50% of LSCC's 150.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.29%
EBITDA margin decline while LSCC shows 109.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of LSCC's 43.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.10%
Operating margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 59.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-65.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.02%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 51.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 65.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
210.42%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.46%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 51.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.50%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 65.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.55%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 51.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-34.35%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.