205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.18%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 6.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.63%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 21.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of LSCC's 14.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.60%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.97%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.71%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.09%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 111.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.36%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 83.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.50%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 84.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.00%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 33.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.81%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 97.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 97.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.76%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSCC's 192.65%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-10.69%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 96.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.78%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 96.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.76%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 96.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 96.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.18%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.