205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.41%
Similar revenue growth to LSCC's 2.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.67%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.40%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.75%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 0.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.06%
R&D reduction while LSCC shows 1.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 1.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.15%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.84%
EBITDA growth below 50% of LSCC's 19.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.41%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 200.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of LSCC's 37.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.79%
Operating margin growth below 50% of LSCC's 38.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-48.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.19%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.19%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSCC's 137.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.20%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.52%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.