205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.26%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-26.53%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.26%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 7.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.44%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.95%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.27%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 82.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.54%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-80.00%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 19.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.12%
Operating margin decline while LSCC shows 7.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
135.71%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-58.33%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 58.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSCC shows 52.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
97.18%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-84.11%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 60.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 53.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 58.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.89%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 58.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.47%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.62%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.