205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.77%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 13.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.54%
Cost growth less than half of LSCC's 21.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.59%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.65%
R&D growth less than half of LSCC's 28.51%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.41%
Other expenses change of 101.41% while LSCC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
28.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 15.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.24%
Total costs growth less than half of LSCC's 17.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
D&A reduction while LSCC shows 6.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-21.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 18.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 48.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.43%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LSCC's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.