205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
8.71%
Cost increase while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-11.24%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
R&D growth while LSCC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses change of 80.27% while LSCC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.20%
Total costs growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.00%
Similar interest expense growth to LSCC's 47.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
46.90%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LSCC's 2.82%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-55.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-50.42%
Net income decline while LSCC shows 207.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.75%
Net margin decline while LSCC shows 257.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
EPS decline while LSCC shows 218.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.02%
Diluted EPS decline while LSCC shows 209.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.