205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.74%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 2.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.06%
Cost reduction while LSCC shows 8.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.10%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.38%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.38%
R&D growth less than half of LSCC's 19.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.49%
Other expenses reduction while LSCC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.14%
Operating expenses reduction while LSCC shows 11.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 10.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.90%
D&A reduction while LSCC shows 23.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.57%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.30%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.77%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.19%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-105.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.02%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
94.00%
Similar tax expense growth to LSCC's 122.62%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-11.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.54%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of LSCC's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.04%
Diluted share increase while LSCC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.